Our Stolen Futurea book by Theo Colborn, Dianne Dumanoski, and John Peterson Myers


Wall Street Journal
25 April 2003

Gulf War Illness May Be Due To Pesticides, Says Pentagon

Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- Tens of thousands of soldiers in the first Gulf War may have been overexposed to pesticides and that may have contributed to some veterans' unexplained illnesses, the Pentagon said in a report.

The report, released Thursday, said it is likely that at least 41,000 service members may have been overexposed to combinations of pest strips, sprayed pesticides and fly baits during the 1991 war. The conclusions were reached after the department's Deployment Health directorate conducted 900 interviews with veterans, including preventive-medicine personnel. Of those interviewed, about 322 had specific information related to pesticide exposure, the Pentagon said.

The report is final "because no new information has been received to change the findings and assessments of the previous report," a statement accompanying it said. A Pentagon spokeswoman said the report was an update of a report released in January 2001.

Steve Robinson, an advocate for Gulf War veterans, said the findings were news to him and other veterans. "Had these conclusions been released then we would have all talked about it," he said. Mr. Robinson, who runs the National Gulf War Resource Center, said the conclusions in the report further affirm sick veterans' long-held beliefs that exposures to toxic substances in the gulf may be partly to blame for their illnesses.

When the 2001 report was announced, Bernard Rostker, then head of the Pentagon's Gulf War illness office, said a link between pesticide exposure and the soldiers' illnesses couldn't be established, although he couldn't exclude the possibility.

Thousands of veterans returned from the first Gulf War complaining of a variety of symptoms that included chronic fatigue, diarrhea, migraines, dizziness, memory problems and in some cases Lou Gehrig's disease, a debilitating, neurological illness.

Many veterans have been distrustful of government research on the illnesses because they were first widely attributed to stress. Mr. Robinson said the inconclusive findings in the report are an argument for keeping accurate health information on soldiers before, during and after their deployment.

Of the 41,000, at least 30,500 soldiers may have been at elevated risk for short-term health effects because of exposure to pest strips. Another group of about 7,000 may have been exposed to pesticides applied during spraying operations and about 3,500 to 4,500 pesticide applicators were "probably one of the more highly pesticide-exposed groups," the Pentagon said.

In addition to the interviews, the Pentagon report is based on information from a review of scientific literature by Rand Corp. and a survey of Gulf War veterans the think tank conducted.

The report also found that the military did a good job of protecting service members from infection by pest-borne diseases. The Defense Department said only 40 cases of pest-borne diseases were documented, due in part to the "effective pest management programs implemented by the military."





OSF Home
 About this website
Book Basics
  Synopsis & excerpts
  The bottom line
  Key points
  The big challenge
  Chemicals implicated
  The controversy
New Science
  Broad trends
  Basic mechanisms
  Brain & behavior
  Disease resistance
  Human impacts
  Low dose effects
  Mixtures and synergy
  Ubiquity of exposure
  Natural vs. synthetic
  New exposures
  Wildlife impacts
Recent Important    Results
Myths vs. Reality
Useful Links
Important Events
Important Books
Other Sources
Other Languages
About the Authors
Talk to us: email