Our Stolen Futurea book by Theo Colborn, Dianne Dumanoski, and John Peterson Myers

New York Times
26 June 2003

Nation's Birth Rate Falls to Record Low

WASHINGTON (AP) -- America's birth rate fell to a record low last year as both teenagers and women in their prime childbearing years had fewer babies, the government said Wednesday.

But the percentages of premature and low birth weight babies climbed, continuing the rise of recent years.

[editors note: coincidentally, research using blood samples stored since the 1950s/60s, analyzed using modern quantitative chemistry and correlated with birth and health records has revealed strong associations between DDT levels in mothers' serum and (1) preterm birth and (2) greater difficulty for the daughter exposed in the womb at becoming pregnant 3 decades later.]

The birth rate was 13.9 per 1,000 persons in 2002, the Health and Human Services Department announced. That compares with 14.1 a year ago. The most recent high was 16.7 in 1990.

The latest figure is the lowest in government records that go back to the turn of the 20th century, according to Brady Hamilton, a demographer at the National Center for Health Statistics.

A major factor in the decline has been the reduction in births to teenagers in recent years, Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson said. He called that ``a significant accomplishment.''

Other factors also play a part, including the aging of the population, added Hamilton.

Hamilton noted that women in their prime childbearing years have been choosing to have fewer children and, as the population ages, there are fewer women in their 20s and 30s.

Overall, there were 4,019,280 births in the United States in 2002, down from 4,025,933 the year before.

Some 12 percent of last year's births were premature, compared with 11.9 percent in 2001. In addition, 7.8 percent were listed as low birth weight, which the center said was at the highest level in more than 30 years. Last year's rate was 7.7 percent.

Those increases came despite greater access to prenatal care. The center said 83.8 percent of women began receiving care in the first trimester of pregnancy last year, compared with 83.4 percent in 2001 and 75.8 percent in 1990.

The birth rate for unmarried women declined last year to 43.6 per 1,000 unmarried women, but this group still accounted for more than one-third of all births.

Other findings in the study of births in 2002 included:

--Teenagers 15 to 19 had a birth rate of 42.9 per 1,000, down from 45.3 in 2001 and 47.7 in 2000. The rate for girls 10 to 14 was 0.7 per 1,000, down from 0.8 in 2001.

--For women 20 to 24, the rate was 103.5 per 1,000, down from 106.2 in 2001. For women 25 to 29, the rate was unchanged at 113.6.

--The birth rate dropped between 2001 and 2002 from 91.9 to 91.6 per 1,000 for women 30 to 34.

--For women 35 to 39 and 40 to 44 the birth rates edged up. It went from 40.6 to 41.4 for the former, and 8.1 to 8.3 for the later. The rate for women aged 45 to 54 was unchanged at 0.5.

--Last year, more than one-fourth of births, 26.1 percent, were by Caesarean section, compared with 24.4 percent in 2001.


On the Net:

National Center for Health Statistics: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs





OSF Home
 About this website
Book Basics
  Synopsis & excerpts
  The bottom line
  Key points
  The big challenge
  Chemicals implicated
  The controversy
New Science
  Broad trends
  Basic mechanisms
  Brain & behavior
  Disease resistance
  Human impacts
  Low dose effects
  Mixtures and synergy
  Ubiquity of exposure
  Natural vs. synthetic
  New exposures
  Wildlife impacts
Recent Important    Results
Myths vs. Reality
Useful Links
Important Events
Important Books
Other Sources
Other Languages
About the Authors
Talk to us: email